Defending the First Amendment…For Everyone
IMUS: So, I watched the basketball game last night between — a little bit of Rutgers and Tennessee, the women’s final.
ROSENBERG: Yeah, Tennessee won last night — seventh championship for [Tennessee coach] Pat Summitt, I-Man. They beat Rutgers by 13 points.
IMUS: That’s some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos and –
McGUIRK: Some hard-core hos.
IMUS: That’s some nappy-headed hos there…
Within a week of these comments we Rutgers students flooded from buses toward a normally peaceful grassy knoll. We stood in a massive semi-circle hoisting homemade signs in the air. We raised our voices and pumped our fists in unison -protesting against racism and sexism.
A panel of speakers delivered impassioned speeches urging the student body to reject not only Imus’ statements, but all forms of racism and sexism in society. Their words spread through the crowd like a strong breeze through a forest, lifting the heads and spirits of those that had been weighed down by Imus’ invective.
Tables lined the perimeter armed with the names, numbers, and addresses of the advertising companies that endorsed Imus.
We called. We wrote. We signed. We made them accountable.
This controlled chaos, this organized moment of anarchy, was what I had waited for my entire college career. Students, faculty, and administration of all genders, races, and ages joined together to fight this injustice. Finally something mattered enough for us to shrug off the stereotypical apathy said to plague my generation – to gather together and make ourselves heard.
And heard we were. Within the next week several of Imus’ advertising sponsors pulled their support from the on-air personality, fearing that too much of their core audience would link them to his deplorable remarks. Following the televised protest he was suspended from the radio station, slapped with a lawsuit, and eventually forced to make an apology to the women’s basketball team.
During the months that this situation unfolded the words of passionate students, sympathetic editorials, and neutral news analysts flooded the Rutgers community. The First Amendment was under attack. Why was the government tolerating racist and sexist ideas? Why couldn’t freedom of speech apply to just the “good” ideas? Why couldn’t anyone just shut this guy up?
Let’s face it, the First Amendment is a dangerous and antagonistic concept. It makes space for all ideas regardless of whether they are rooted in truth or falsehood. Anyone with eyes, a mouth, or hands can announce their opinions to the world (much like this column) and very little recourse can be taken against them. Or can it? Despite the overwhelming desire to just shut a person up, it remains true that mere words – facts, information, debate – have more impact than a roll of duct tape ever will.
It is the protection of the right to express these ideas that improves the cultural conversation about the social politics of race, sex, religion, gender, tradition, and life. So as frustrating and antagonistic and dangerous as it may seem, this amendment affords us the right to turn instances like the Imus debacle into teachable moments. Just as Imus was protected in expressing his prejudice, we were protected in rising up against it.
As a free and progressive society it is essential that we give all ideas, no matter how base or inflammatory, the opportunity to be expressed and challenged. The amendment helps us question our core beliefs, search for our own definable truth, as well as dispel myths by seeking out the facts. Unfortunately this process includes wading through the bigotry and prejudice of people like Don Imus. Nevertheless you’ll also find that it provides you with rational thought, enlightenment, and intellect-based support for your thoughts.
The First Amendment may seem like a nuisance or a cheap soapbox for any “shock jock” looking for attention, but upon closer inspection you’ll see that it is so much more than that. It’s a vehicle for enlightenment, a sound stage for justice, and often a creator of communities.
Psychologist Weighs In On Handling Holiday Separation
The holidays are traditionally a time for families to be together. That message is in the songs, the movies, and even displayed in storefront windows. What happens when your family is separated by more than distance but by the physical and psychological barriers imposed by incarceration? How then do you cope with the holidays?
We recently sat down with Dr. Harland Kessaris to talk about how to cope with the absence of a loved one during the holiday season and other questions asked by you. As a psychologist who specializes in re-entry of incarcerated individuals back into family and society, he was able to provide some insight into handling this potentially alienating time of year.
Dr. Kessaris stressed the importance of open communication between children, the incarcerated, and those caring for the children, “As much as you can you should include them [the incarcerated],” said Kessaris. “I think people need to be reminded, encouraged, and assisted in doing that.” For Kessari, the key is to make a sincere effort to connect personally.
Click here to listen to audio excerpts of the interview with Dr. Kessaris.
Lives In Focus Project Gives Families of the Incarcerated Space
Lives in Focus is a project that uses video, audio, and photographs to present the voices and stories of those coping with loved ones being in prison. The website (livesinfocus.org/prison) provides a space where families of the incarcerated can:
Connect with others going through similar situations and join our free social network
Watch our video blogs or express yourself and submit your own
Read the latest news articles on incarceration
Get info on upcoming events and workshops
The project also trains at-risk community youth in video and audio editing at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism so they can tell their own story in their own style and learn valuable skills at the same time. To find out more about the project or how to get involved visit the site.
Art Imitating Life: Tina Fey as Sarah Palin on SNL
The sexism that has completely consumed this election (on both sides of the campaign) is comically parodied by Saturday Night Live. If nothing else maybe the mainstream media distributors can stand back and take a look at themselves in the mirror that the comedy sketch offers up.
Mogul or Monster? The Legacy of Ike Turner
Ike Turner, 76, died of undisclosed causes in his suburban San Marcos home on December 12, 2007.
The Rock and Roll Hall of Famer was credited with producing the first Rock and Roll recording (Rocket 88) and several chart topping hits. In the musical community he is seen as one of the primary architects of the R&B rock and roll genre. A prolific guitarist that had a way with words, Turner made a name for himself on talent and determination.
However, Turner was not only a legend for his music, but also the melody he played outside of the studio. His drug use and violently turbulent marriage to Tina Turner were documented in the 1986 autobiography “I,Tina” and the 1993 film “What’s Love Got To Do With It?” As reported in USA Today article published on December 13th, Ike Turner disputed his portrayal in both instances.
How is this man to be remembered? For his remarkable ability to move a nation through song, or his inability to keep a raging anger in check? An extensive article by MSNBC suggests that Turner had begun to reconstruct his image as of late, even winning a Grammy in 2007, but acknowledged that his reputation was still representative of the man who abused Tina Turner.
Reportedly Tina Turner declined to comment on Ike Turner’s death. Her spokeswoman, Michele Schweitzer said in a statement “Tina is aware that Ike passed away earlier today. She has not had any contact with him in 35 years. No further comment will be made.”
Fault and talent are two things that never fall far apart. However the overlap leaves only one able to prevail. Should the smooth bass line of guitar riff overshadow brutal domestic abuse? Should one’s character be defined in one period of their life? How will society regard this man in history?
The truth is that Ike Turner was both – an achievement and a disappointment, talented and flawed. Though to ignore that in the wake of his death would be a disservice to his memory no matter which way those remembering are swayed.
In his own words during an interview with the Associated Press “I know what I am in my heart. And I know regardless of what I’ve done, good and bad, it took it all to make me what I am today,”
-
Archives
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (3)
- October 2008 (2)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (1)
- September 2007 (2)
- August 2007 (1)
-
Categories
- AIDS
- Announcements
- bronx
- Business
- City Agencies
- Community Issues
- culture
- Economy
- Education
- Famous Names
- fashion
- Gender
- Gov Legislation
- Health
- HIV
- Incarceration Issues
- LGBTQ Issues
- Lives In Focus Project
- Media
- music
- New Jersey
- Politics
- Race Relations
- Schools
- Sexual Health
- society
- Sports
- Uncategorized
- youth
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS




![UT 3, 4 & The Milky Way [video] UT 3, 4 & The Milky Way [video]](http://static.flickr.com/2633/4135738280_d16c9dd389_t.jpg)